Why electronic filing needs a separate decision
Treat electronic filing as a short list of facts to confirm, not a single yes-or-no impression. Whether e-filing is mandatory, optional, or unavailable comes first; which electronic filing service is authorized should be checked on its own rather than inferred from it.
Since the case record has not been created yet, correcting a wrong assumption here is straightforward. Use it to close out accepted document formats and size limits before that assumption can travel into a filing or a service step.
Record whether e-filing is mandatory, optional, or unavailable as the first line, then attach which electronic filing service is authorized as its own entry, cited independently.
Turn this step into concrete checks
Add accepted document formats and size limits, how filing fees are paid, and how to confirm the clerk accepted rather than merely received the submission to the same worksheet. Back each of the three with a document, a citation, or an official instruction — not memory.
One dated line per fact is enough, as long as it is sourced. Cite the source for how filing fees are paid, and connect how to confirm the clerk accepted rather than merely received the submission to its supporting record.
Build the working file for this question
Anchor the file to the primary documents, and note whether e-filing is mandatory, optional, or unavailable and how to confirm the clerk accepted rather than merely received the submission as two separate, independently-checkable entries.
Use the example as a model for how the file should read. After the facts are confirmed, attach accepted document formats and size limits to its source document and the applicable official guidance.
The example ties together which electronic filing service is authorized and how filing fees are paid. Note how each affects the outcome separately, since the scenario is meant to organize the facts, not replace the governing local rule.
State-specific checks and next steps for electronic filing
The recurring error on electronic filing is assuming a procedure from a different state carries over. Go back to the controlling court's own instruction before treating this as settled.
